[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Mt. Whitney and the white mountains
- Subject: [pct-l] Mt. Whitney and the white mountains
- From: StoneDancer1 at aol.com (StoneDancer1@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Feb 18 18:50:18 2004
In a message dated 2/18/2004 4:09:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
judsonb@internetcds.com writes:
.................................................
>>>>>Anybody out there know the story. (since this involves Whitney, perhaps
it's
not totally off topic??)<<<<<
William Brewer in his journals (Up and Down California in 1860-1864) writes
about the naming of Whitney. He did most of the surveying as Whitney was
almost always running around Sacramento trying to get money (that they were
promised)...mostly to no avail. The mountain was named in July 1864 by Clarence
King and Richard Cotter, of the Whitney Survey. They saw it from the summit of
Mt. Tyndal, a few miles to the north. They named it in honor of Whitney and
against his wishes. King came back in 1871 and climbed what he thought was
Whitney, but turned out to be Langley, a few miles to the south. Whitney was
finally climbed in 1873 by some local Lone Pine residents. They called
Fisherman's Peak, since they were coming back from a fishing trip. There was
considerable friction between the locals and the Survey....the Survey winning out in the
end. White Mountain is a beautiful place... go there. The University of
California's White Mountain Research Station is just below the summit. You can
drive to above 11000 ft. But...White Mountain was not blown up...or down. It is
not as high as Whitney... legends not withstanding.