[pct-l] Misquote

["David B. Stockton" <davstock@tiac.net>]

Just to be straight --
I didn't say this, I quoted it from a recent Digest, in which this was said 
by someone else in a humorous context.
That is the reason I put the << and >> quotation marks around it and 
isolated it spatially from my comment.

A 42-gallon drum would be more for the ultralighters; it certainly wouldn't 
do the trick for a real throughhiker.

BTW -- Phenal Pinkerbody!  How is your culvert-based alcohol stove design 
coming along?

I've been able to locate a source of bulk Dehydrated H2O if anyone is 
interested.  It would probably be more appropriate for the S. Cal sections, 
though.

-- Dave

Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 00:30:10 -0800
From: Owen Kittredge <owenk@quiknet.com>
Subject: Re: [pct-l] New Stove Designs

"David B. Stockton" wrote:

>
> PS. Greg should be disqualified from all stove testing because of close 
ties
> with the oil
> industry and his unfair advantage to receive 55 gallon drums.

Sorry fokes Greg's connections with the oil industry will not help a barrel 
of
oil is 42 gallons ! Maybe a geologist from the environmental industry would
have a DOT drum he could use (recycled of course)

Owen K

>

* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List |  http://www.backcountry.net   *

==============================================================================