[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] RE: Gravity
- Subject: [pct-l] RE: Gravity
- From: stewjohns at comcast.net (stewjohns@comcast.net)
- Date: Wed Dec 7 06:34:39 2005
Can you give me a location where you know for a fact that a car will roll uphill? I would like to see that myself. I would also like to take a gps altitude reading of the area to prove if indeed it is a hill going up? I know that gravity is not uniform across the globe, and there are small and high anomilies, but this car rolling uphill goes against everything I have ever read about gravity. Doing a web search on the topic states that it is not true. Please provide a location that such a thing can occure.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Junaid Dawud <jdawud@yahoo.com>
> Aloha,
>
> No. such places are for real.
>
> A car in neutral will roll uphill if it is located in
> the right spot near a gravity anomoly. These
> anomolies have to do with large areas of either high
> or low mass. It is not a violation of the laws of
> physics, it is the laws of physics creating an unusual
> situation because of nonstandard mass distribution.
> If anyone really wants to know about this stuff take a
> crap load of geophysics, cus some formuals from 1st
> year college physics isn't enough to really get it.
>
> I actually measured gravity during a geophysics lab.
> At the bottom of a steep cliff, the gravity was
> actually less because of the large mass of the
> mountain pulling up. Similarly, if you are directly
> above a large area of low density (salt dome or
> something), then gravity will be less. If you are
> above a very dense body, gravity will be higher.
>
> Someone said something about density not having to do
> with gravity. remember that density is the amount of
> material per unit volume. If you have two spheres of
> the same mass but different volumes, the gravitational
> field at the surface of the dense sphere will be
> greater than the gravitational field at the surface of
> the less dense sphere, since the distance to the
> center of the mass is shorter.
>
> yeah gravity!!!
>
> -----------junaid
>
> --- stewjohns@comcast.net wrote:
>
> > A car in nuetral will roll uphill? Not possible...
> > that would violate the laws of physics. My guess is
> > that you visited one of those touron traps that
> > claims such a thing, but in reality is just an
> > optical illusion. Check out this site.
> >
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/roll-uphill.html
> >
> > This is what happens when you apply the laws of
> > physics to a question.
> >
> > Doc Holiday,
> >
> > "Trail urban myth buster and seeker of truth"
> >
> >
> > -------------- Original message --------------
> >
> > > > > What if gravity were variable like the
> > weather.
> > >
> > >
> > > Gravity is variable. Just not very much so. If you
> >
> > > are above a large dense rock formation then you
> > will
> > > be experienceing higher gravity. There is a large
> > > gravity anomoly in the Indian ocean that
> > suppossedly
> > > causes sea level to be lower locally. Many places
> > > have 'gravity anomolies' where a car in neutral
> > will
> > > go UP a hill.
> > >
> > > This is what happens to you when you study
> > geology.
> > >
> > > --------junaid
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________
> > > Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
> > > Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> > > dsl.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pct-l mailing list
> > > pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> > > unsubscribe or change options:
> > > http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > pct-l mailing list
> > pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> > unsubscribe or change options:
> > http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> pct-l mailing list
> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> unsubscribe or change options:
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l From gobig2006 at gmail.com Wed Dec 7 11:45:21 2005
From: gobig2006 at gmail.com (Robert Francisco)
Date: Wed Dec 7 11:50:59 2005
Subject: [pct-l] PCT postage stamp!
In-Reply-To: <20051207110408.80573.qmail@web60324.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <410-22005123775540609@earthlink.net>
<20051207110408.80573.qmail@web60324.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <f0971acd0512070945w526b58a4s265839f8462c8d2c@mail.gmail.com>
The unveiling of the PCT stamp is scheduled for May 27, 2006. I figure the
class of 06 can all celebrate at Hiker Heaven.
go-BIG
On 12/7/05, Datto <datto_atl2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Lick the back of the PCT stamp and it tastes like corn pasta.
>
> Datto
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> pct-l mailing list
> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> unsubscribe or change options:
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>