[pct-l] Re "ultralight water cache dependant route"

[marge at prothman.org (Marge Prothman)]

I agree with Steve when I saw the words:
 
Ultralight Water Cache DEPENDANT Route it made me think really hard. Is that
what the majority of the Hikers did this year? Did they depend on the water
caches? It never entered my thoughts that these caches would become
dependant.  There is a good chance that I might be on the trail in 2005 and
if so I think that I should be able to carry enough water for my needs and
use the caches to top off maybe.

To use Steves phrase " Water for thought"
Cheers,
Marge   [The Old Gal]
http://www.prothman.org/marge 

-----Original Message-----
From: pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net
[mailto:pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net] On Behalf Of Steve Courtway
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:07 PM
To: pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Re: PCT advice


In review from what we saw this season, anyone (and their dog) who uses the
so called "ultralight water cache dependant route" is possibly depriving
someone who actually NEEDS the water of its intended use.

water for thought,
s.c.