[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[pct-l] a few confusing spots??



For me, I can't really blame maps for the confusion - it was me. Sometimes I
refused to believe the maps; others I misread the signs; others I lost which
direction I had come from; others I couldn't find any signs indicting I was
on the PCT; others there were detours, new clear cuts, etc.; others I
followed the biggest trail which wasn't the PCT.  So, what I am saying is
that the maps in the book are OK. Just watch what you are doing.

Marshall Karon
Portland, OR
m.karon@attbi.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Ellinwood" <rellinwood@worldnet.att.net>
To: <pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:30 AM
Subject: [pct-l] a few confusing spots??


> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> For former PCT-ers:     From going through the archives, I realize that
most
> folks consider the maps in the guidebook to be adequate and that some
folks
> took also either DeLorme pages, FS maps, or others (Tom Harrison maps) to
> give "the big picture" in case of a need to bail out in a hurry.
>
> However, I would be grateful if those who have done the PCT before would
> reflect and share the one or two (or handful of) places where a 7.5 minute
> topo would really have helped your momentary confusion.  Could you cite a
> few spots where, for whatever reason, you were unsure of how to proceed?
>
> With printable topo maps available from www.morethanamile.com and
> www.hikertrash.net <http://www.hikertrash.com> , it would be nice to know
> what exact spots to focus on as having given others trouble in the past.
>
> Bob
>
> Bob Ellinwood
> Bedford, VA
>
> --
> [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ]
> _______________________________________________
> PCT-L mailing list
> PCT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>