[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Trail Food
"bill blovis" <blovis@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>My body objects to that diet. What more can I say?
That's a head problem - has nothing to do with your body.
>And I find it really interesting that you personally attack me -- calling
>me a "non-thruhiker," which must be the most extreme sort of
>excommunication on this list -- and then go to accuse me of being unwilling
>to learn.
No attack - just a simple statement of fact. You're welcome to take it as
an attack if you like, but that's your problem - not mine.
So far, you've shown a great willingness to argue - I've yet to see any
indication that you're here to learn anything. I'd welcome any evidence to
the contrary.
>I post my experience, you post yours. Isn't that the point?
Your viewpoint, your experience - don't seem to be consistent with anything
that even resembles thruhiking - or long-distance hiking - or support for
the PCT. If I'm wrong, please point out my error.
As for experience - what experience do you have with long distance hiking?
In this context "long distance hiking" could mean any hiking for 60 days or
more - anywhere in the world. If you have any such experience, I think a
number of us would be interested in hearing about it.
If you haven't done any such thing, are you willing to learn about it - or
do you just want to argue about something that you don't know anything
about?
>I could posit that you've gone insane from eating too many candy bars, but
>I won't.
Once again, you tell the world of your lack of experience with long distance
hiking. ALL long distance hikers - and thruhikers in particular - ARE
insane. That's a given. Has nothing whatever to do with candy bars.
Walk softly,
Jim
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp