Re: [pct-l] flame?

["R.J. Baynum" <rjbaynum@nidlink.com>]

How about contradicting statements? like one about Mules?...
First you don't like them, and then you have nothing against them...
hhhmmm?
Can't we all just get along?!!!
R.J.

reynolds@ilan.com wrote:
> 
> BJ,
> I don't see a personal attack.
> 
> The text in question:
> >I won't lower myself to address BJ's last list of inaccurate
> >statements,assumptions and generalities as I have found she only is
> >fishing for flames.  I won't bite.
> 
> Calling statements innacurate gereralities based on [false] assumptions doesn't
> attack you personally. In our last series of posts you, correctly, corrected my
> innacurate statement based on fales assumptions that ther were no bear boxs
> south of Crabtree. I was wrong. I posted BAD info on the net. You straightened
> it out. That was GOOD -- not a personal attack.
> 
> If sometimes I post  "inaccurate statements,assumptions and generalities" please
> "lower" yourself to correct me.
> 
> Regards,
> TOM
> 
> * From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List |  http://www.backcountry.net   *
* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List |  http://www.backcountry.net   *

==============================================================================