[pct-l] POSTING QUESTION

[reinholdmetzger at cox.net (Reinhold Metzger)]

That works if I reply to a message in my mail box but not to messages on the
pct-l mail list, it does not give you the 3 options of response.
When I respond to a pct-l post it always winds up as a separate post, it
never attaches to the prior post that I'm responding to.  When you responded
to my original post on the pct-l how did you attach your reply to my post,
it did not go to your mail box. You replied directly to the pct-l post and
it attached to my post.

JMT REINHOLD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Stanton" <craigstanton@mac.com>
To: "Reinhold Metzger" <reinholdmetzger@cox.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [pct-l] POSTING QUESTION


> The original post came through so reply-all is the trick. Hope the
> shoulder thing doesn't cause too many problems, and that you'll be on
> the walk in '07, I'd like to know the ideas man behind Hiking Chickens.
>
> ~Craig
>
>
> On 30/03/2006, at 6:12 PM, Reinhold Metzger wrote:
>
> > Craig,     Thanks for the input. I will try it on my reply to your
> > post.
> > The reason for the caps lock is a trashed shoulder which required
> > reconstructive
> > shoulder surgery leaving my left arm useless (temporarily I hope)
> > and makes one handed typing easier with the caps lock on.
> > As you can see I managed to type this post in caps & lower so maybe
> > I will
> > continue to do so.
> >
> > JMT REINHOLD
> > Your one armed bandit & camp robber
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Craig Stanton" <craigstanton@mac.com>
> > To: "Reinhold Metzger" <reinholdmetzger@cox.net>
> > Cc: <pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [pct-l] POSTING QUESTION
> >
> >
> >> It depends on your email client, but I always hit 'reply all' to
> >> amke sure
> > the list gets the response, not just the sender, and find the
> > original email
> > appended below.
> >>
> >> While we're talking about emails, I wanted to ask about capslock.
> >> In other
> > internet based correspondance capital letters are interpreted as
> > shouting.
> > I'm not sure what the norm is around here, and I don't know you
> > personally,
> > but I assume you're not shouting while talking about chickens ,
> > dehydrated
> > water and sub-uber-mega-ultra--extreme-light-weight hiking, though
> > they are
> > very exciting subjects and keep me highly entertained when I hsould be
> > working. So, why the capitals?
> >>
> >> ~Craig
> >> Your computer using hiking newbie.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thursday, March 30, 2006, at 04:44PM, Reinhold Metzger
> > <reinholdmetzger@cox.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> HOW DO YOU REPLY TO A POST BY ATTACHING YOU RESPONSE TO THE TOP
> >>> OF THE
> > POST
> >>> THAT YOU ARE RESPONDING TO. I HAVE NOT FIGURED THAT OUT YET AND
> >>> ALWAYS
> > HAVE
> >>> TO SEND AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE RESPONSE POST AND LINK  THE TWO
> >>> POSTS BY
> >>> STATING SO AND SO WROTE SO AND SO.  IT'S A REAL DRAG.
> >>> ANY HELP WILL BE APPRECIATED.
> >>>
> >>> JMT REINHOLD
> >>> Your trail smart but computer arrogant trail companion
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pct-l mailing list
> >>> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> >>> unsubscribe or change options:
> >>> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>