[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Re: pct-l Digest, Vol 34, Issue 1
- Subject: [pct-l] Re: pct-l Digest, Vol 34, Issue 1
- From: wpsnotebook at charter.net (Richard Woods)
- Date: Wed Feb 1 13:05:50 2006
- In-reply-to: <20060201180603.25AE01D28E@edina.hack.net>
- References: <20060201180603.25AE01D28E@edina.hack.net>
I use Pentax 8X25 UCF XII binoculars, about 13 oz. without the case.
Adjust well to both glasses and bare eyeballs, highly rated by
Consumer Reports.
Rick
On Feb 1, 2006, at 10:06 AM, pct-l-request@mailman.backcountry.net
wrote:
> From: Coylescrmnt3@aol.com
> Date: January 31, 2006 11:16:11 PM PST
> To: pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Subject: [pct-l] Re: Binoculars
>
>
> Denise from Louisiana, comment ca va-You are right, 8x40 binoculars
> are
> preferable to 8x20 binoculars in low light situations. I have a
> pair of 8x40
> binoculars and they are great for dawn and dusk use, but they are
> unfortunately,
> too bulky and heavy for overnight backpacking applications. A
> good 8x40
> binocular, like the Eagles you mentioned, weights about 24 oz as
> opposed to 8 oz
> for the 8x20 Zeiss Victory binoculars I mentioned. Some
> lightweight and
> most ultralight backpackers would even consider 8 oz too heavy for
> binoculars.
> The original poster was asking about binoculars to take on long
> extended
> backpacking trips and I think a 24 oz binocular is just too heavy
> for that. The
> Eagles you mentioned are nice binoculars though.