[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] poison oak
I tend to be extremely sensitive to the toxicodendrons, and
have developed poison ivy rashes on most of my Appalachian
Trail hikes over the years. Growing up in the East, I've
been exposed to this plant all my life and am just as
vulnerable to it today as when I was 12 (and breathed in the
burning plant at a 4th of July picnic, resulting in a month
long internal/external rash!)
That said, I had no problems with poison oak, or any such
plants, during the vast majority of my time on the PCT. In
'99 and '00, I had no reaction whatsoever, despite a general
lack of familiarity with poison oak and its variant forms,
and surely having had encounters with the plant as a
consequence of my ignorance. Not until 2001, well into
Washington, did I finally develop an urishiol rash, and
there I wonder whether the culprit was more likely poison
ivy than oak. The rash was fairly vigorous, weeping and
spreading far and wide (probably I slept with the oils still
on me at the time of encounter), and slow to heal. Slower
than most poison ivy cases of yore, but still I'm left to
wonder that my immune response to these plants might
delineate either based on chemical differences between the
oils of ivy and oak, or simply the newness of poison oak oil
upon my immune system.
Are those of us who are most likely to have run-ins with
poison oak in fact the least likely be adversely affected by
it? Anyone care to scratch this philosophical itch?
- blisterfree