[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] re: section hikers v/s Thru Hikers
- Subject: [pct-l] re: section hikers v/s Thru Hikers
- From: rellinwood at worldnet.att.net (Robert Ellinwood)
- Date: Wed Jan 12 10:50:35 2005
- In-reply-to: <ae.698e0640.2f168f28@aol.com>
Only after you've hung it to dry overnight so the other side can be used.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net [mailto:pct-l-
> bounces@mailman.backcountry.net] On Behalf Of Lonetrail@aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:33 AM
> To: pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Subject: Re: [pct-l] re: section hikers v/s Thru Hikers
>
>
> Hi
>
> I really feel we should put this discussion about Section Hikers v/s
> Thru-Hiker to bed. Once and for all. For one last gesture in good faith we
section
> hiker to show our generosity and appreciation to all the thru hiker leave
> behind our used TP to lighten their load
>
> Lonetail
> _______________________________________________
> pct-l mailing list
> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> unsubscribe or change options:
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l