[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[BULK] - Re: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
- Subject: [BULK] - Re: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
- From: kraig.mottar at verizon.net (Kraig Mottar)
- Date: Wed Jan 5 18:22:16 2005
But, according to the formula, I who is 6'3" and weigh 200 lbs, weighed 220 a few months ago before I started working out, should carry 100 lbs. Is this correct? But if someone with any ammount of will lose that body fat after hiking for a while, thus messing up the scale of how much can be carried. Though, if one is able to go to say, 250-300 lbs with no to very little body fat would increase the amount they can carry, correct?
Kraig
> From: "Mike Saenz" <msaenz@mve-architects.com>
> Date: 2005/01/05 Wed PM 03:18:39 PST
> To: "Mark Verber" <verber@gmail.com>, <pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
> Subject: RE: [BULK] - Re: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
>
> I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that if your body weight isn't
> ummm..."ideal", let's say, then the whole pack weight/ body weight
> formula falls apart.
>
> In other words, if you're 5'-10" tall and weight 300 pounds, then a 75
> pound pack is gonna kill you a couple miles into the trail...
>
>
> M i c h a e l S a e n z
> McLarand Vasquez Emsiek & Partners, Inc.
> A r c h i t e c t u r e P l a n n i n g I n t e r i o r s
> w w w . m v e - a r c h i t e c t s . c o m
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net
> [mailto:pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net] On Behalf Of Mark Verber
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 6:10 PM
> To: Don Fletcher
> Cc: pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Subject: [BULK] - Re: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
>
> > Hey : does anyone have any thoughts about body weight to pack weight
> > ratios , for optimum physiologic work while hiking??
> > I have tried to find some science on this to no avail ( so far )
> > Don ( malachi , trail name )
>
> Optimal is a zero pack weight. Alas, that is typically not practical.
> Conventional wisdom is that more than 1/4 of body is definetely *not*
> optimal. My experience is that whenever my pack gets more than 1/6 my
> weight I really start to notice it. Hmm.. when my daughter's pack get
> more than 1/6 her weight she starts complaining.
>
> I recall an article in a sports medical journal (or maybe it was from
> the Army's research center) that had some data related to this question.
> I can't find the article right now... but if I did it up and will send
> you a copy.
>
> --mark
> _______________________________________________
> pct-l mailing list
> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> unsubscribe or change options:
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pct-l mailing list
> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> unsubscribe or change options:
> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>