[pct-l] Deer question?

[jerrygoller at backpackgeartest.org (Jerry Goller)]

Not a problem. I don't completely disagree with you, for that matter. It
is a tough question for us. We want to promote BGT because the more it
is used, the more gear we, being anyone interested in getting involved
with the process, get to review for all of us. But I see nothing wrong
with limiting that promotion to referring specific gear questions to
relevant BGT reports. We're all just trying to share our trail
experience with each other. Plus, it's fun!
See you on the trail, guy. Maybe the next time I go out I can make more
than 125 miles before I have to go to a hospital.....lol.
Jerry
 
 
 <http://www.backpackgeartest.org/> http://www.BackpackGearTest.org :
the most comprehensive interactive gear reviews and tests on the planet.

-----Original Message-----
From: Slyatpct@aol.com [mailto:Slyatpct@aol.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 12:52 PM
To: jerrygoller@backpackgeartest.org; pct-l@backcountry.net
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Deer question?


Hey Jerry,

I agree wholeheartedly and ....

Now that I have your attention publically I like to thank you for your
well thought out and sincere replies to the posting of BGT announcements
thread you made to me privately.  I'd like to withdraw any form of
protest or opinion regarding this issue and apoligize if it was
considered as as an attack by me, it wasn't my intention.  

I'm sure many of listers would appreciate that type of info.  It was
only my intent to offer an opinion that mixing list mail may not be the
best way to use an intented and specific list, like asking AT questions
here when it has a seperate list.

Sly





In a message dated 1/10/2004 2:40:08 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jerrygoller@backpackgeartest.org writes:



People's risk assessment has always amazed me. They think nothing of
driving to the trail head, the most dangerous thing the average person
can do, but want to wipe out mountain lion population because of one
death. It makes no sense....