[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Re foxtails vs bristlecones and other cosmic issues
- Subject: [pct-l] Re foxtails vs bristlecones and other cosmic issues
- From: robertbrady@mindspring.com (Rob Brady)
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:25:01 -0700
Imagine, you saw a foxtail pine that had lived in a ranger station for =
4900 years . . .
I'm just joking with you; my mom was an English teacher and I can't help =
it.=20
1. The foxtail pine is not the same as a bristlecone pine, though they =
are easily confused. The pinecones are noticeably different. The cone =
of the bristlecone pine has long terminal, hooked spines. The foxtail =
cone has much shorter terminal spines.
2. For radiocarbondating methods using old pine trees, and getting it =
within a 'gnat's ass' as you suggest, you might read two of H.E. Suess's =
works on the subject-- "Bristlecone Pine Calibration of the Radiocarbon =
Timescale 5200BC to the Present [1970]" presented in that year to the =
Twelfth Nobel Symposium held in Uppsala, Sweden and published; and the =
record "Bristlecone pine wood of the past 8000 years based on the =
dendrochronology (read: tree ring counting) of the late C.W. Ferguson" =
contained in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, =
vol A 330 pp 403-412. War tree-huggers.=20
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---