[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Canisters, Helmets and Seat Belts
- Subject: [pct-l] Canisters, Helmets and Seat Belts
- From: m_factor@hotmail.com (Mara Factor)
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:22:15 -0400
I agree with Jim and Carl. I really don't care if you don't want to wear
your seatbelt or motorcycle helmet as long as the consequences of your
actions don't cause my taxes or insurance premiums to go up in the event you
have an accident with claims that would have otherwise been reduced.
As for canisters, a number of people have made the argument that because
they have successfully camped any number of nights without any bear
interactions, that their bear deterence methods must be working and they
will continue to use the same methods in the future. Well, if I take 10
trips in my car without my seat belt and do not get into any accidents, does
that really mean I should continue to drive without my seatbelt if my goal
is to really reduce injury to myself in the case of an accident?
In the case of a bear, during the one failure, unfortunately it's not you
that must deal with the worst of the consequences, it's the bear that
becomes habituated and must eventually be relocated (only to bother someone
else, somewhere else) or destroyed. Remember, the goal here is to not only
protect your food, but to protect the bear.
As for the wrist rockets, who is going to stay away all night to chase the
bear away? They might work while you are awake but are probably not worth
it given that much bear activity probably (please correct me if I'm wrong,
here) occurs at night. And not everyone bear bags where they sleep and
might not wake up even if the bear did make a bunch of noise.
Ah well. I wish I had the perfect solution for everyone. I'm planning a
PCT hike (2003?) and may have to think about some of this stuff. Right now,
on the east coast, bear bagging, when done properly, is still enough to keep
the bears from getting your food. But, I'm really disappointed to read
about the failures of the Ursack Ultra.
Mara
>From: "Jim Mayer" <jmayer@rochester.rr.com>
>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:09:51 -0400
>
>Hi Monty,
>
>I share your frustration with "one size fits all" regulations, but I also
>disagree with your reasoning. ...
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp