[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Re: RE Biggest Difference between AT Thru-Hike
- To: PCT-L@backcountry.net
- Subject: [pct-l] Re: RE Biggest Difference between AT Thru-Hike
- Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 10:55 AM
I thought the Ursack was having some serious difficulties this past bear
season. The failed when
assaulted by bears, not necessarily park bears, more readily than had first
been expected.
I'm considering a JMT through hike for next year and I'd love to use an
Ursack instead of a bear
canister to save a couple of pounds, but am concerned with bears. Is the
Ursack up to the challenge
now? By the way, I'd NOT have dinner where I would camp. I'd eat and then
move down the trail at
least a mile or so before calling it a night.
** Ken **
On 12/21/00 at 9:08 AM, Reynolds, WT <reynolds@ilan.com> wrote:
> In areas other than those requiring special care I would invest in a
URSACK.
** Kenneth Knight Web Design, IT Consultant, Software Engineer **
** krk@speakeasy.org http://www.speakeasy.org/~krk **
* From the PCT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
* From the PCT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================
To: PCT-L@backcountry.net