[pct-l] Re: Implications & Assumptions

[Bighummel@aol.com]

Dear Karen,

If I implied errantly and mistook your intentions, I apologize, as that 
infuriates me more than anything when someone does this to me on this list or 
otherwise.  "But we humans sometimes hear what we want to hear."

I enjoy your messages and your articulate way of expression.  We, the "water 
people" appreciate your appreciation.  We also understand that too much is 
not good and think that we, perhaps, have reached too much.  As stated, we 
intend to back off because of the apparent over-reliance.  

However, as to not announcing the location of them would be a poor choice.  
We have intended to put them out of sight (I actually don't know if this was 
done at the "Lucky 5 Ranch" site this year. Charlie?) so that:

1) "illegals" would not benefit from them nor take what others may need to 
count on
2) "purists" wouldn't even see them and be able to continue to believe pure 
thoughts
3) general asthetic values are preserved.

Thank you for your insights and points.  They have been taken seriously, 
obviously from the discussion that they have generated.

Best regards,

Greg "Strider" Hummel 
* From the PCT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *

==============================================================================