[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] "national monument" vs "national park".
- Subject: [pct-l] "national monument" vs "national park".
- From: Brick Robbins <brick@fastpack.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:03:47 -0800
At 03:00 PM 01/07/2000 , Jonathan Ley <over_there@geocities.com> wrote:
>St. Helens is a "national monument", not a "national park".
>(why the USA even has this distinction is beyond me!)
They are both administered by the National Park Service, a part of the
Department of Interior as apposed the US Forest Service, (tree sellers)
that are part of the Department of Agriculture. Your Golden Whatever pass
should be good in all NPS administered sites (parks, monuments, national
historic sites, national historic battle fields...). Don't know why they
had problems. It could be that Mt Saint "Boom" is a "Designated Recreation
Use Facility" per 36CFR71.5. The same rule applies ot
" (c) The annual Golden Eagle Passport does not authorize the use of
any Designated Recreation Use Facility for which a recreation use fee is
charged or any Special Recreation Permit Use for which a special
recreation permit fee is charged."
The major difference between a park and a monument is the protection
afforded the land and what it takes to make one. A National Monument can be
made by presidential decree, and affords a lower level of protection to the
land. National Parks take an Act of Congress, and provide more protection.
For example, Joshua Tree was a National Monument for several years before
it was upgraded to a National Park.
If you are REALLY bored, read Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(36CFR)
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_99/36cfrv1_99.html
Fee-Haters might find
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_99/36cfr71_99.html
interesting.
-Brick
* From the PCT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================