[pct-l] ULA and Eric
Melanie Clarke
melaniekclarke at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 10:42:37 CDT 2012
I feel ULA made a sound marketing decision. While men seem to detest
looking at the male form, women are not so hung up on silly gender issues.
Heterosexual women at times can look with interest at the female form. We
may not get the same excitement as a man but I like to compare myself or
become a fantasy. Fancy clothes does this for me also. I am close enough to
Anna that I could pretend I was her. I'm only 5'8" and 20 years older but
you get the idea.
I'm just saying!
Toga
On Oct 19, 2012 10:40 AM, "Austin Greavette" <austin.greavette at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > So, to bring it back around to the topic at hand - ULA put together a
> > gratuitous joke at the expense of women.
>
>
> How is that at the expense of women? This entire conversation
> is ridiculous. They did not twist that poor girls arm to do it and for all
> we know, the VP of Marketing could be a woman. When they sat down and
> decided to film this, I seriously doubt they would felt they would be doing
> it at the expense of women. Lord only knows.... Had it have been a man,
> maybe this argument would be about how men get picked for everything.
>
>
>
> > By doing that, they broadly imply
> > that they think the vast majority of their customer base is male and that
> > they don't take any female customers very seriously,
>
>
> Eric - you need to re-read the stuff you write. Honestly? ULA doesn't take
> females very seriously? Not only is that absurd, it's wasting my space in
> my email box from people crying because a woman was used and it takes away
> from out badassery???
>
>
> >
> > women are credible long-distance backpackers.
>
>
> Again - wow. Thanks for the lesson. I think we all get that including ULA
> who had recently invested some serious time in and energy towards better
> straps for women.
>
>
> >
> > It's not about whether we saw certain body parts or not; it's about the
> > disenfranchisement of women hikers.
> >
> > Explain please, because I think at this point you're just trying to jump
> on a band wagon.
>
>
>
> > So in summary, there's a huge fundamental difference between, say, coming
> > across a nude swimmer at a hot spring and the video that ULA posted. One
> > is
> > just normal life (yes, women have breasts, get over it) and the other is
> a
> > cruel joke.
> >
>
> LMFAO - a cruel joke on a woman who did it? to all the women who had to see
> it? How about all the women and men who clicked on it specifically knowing
> what it was:? Maybe that is you disrespecting a woman?
>
> If you don't like ULA for this video - DON"T buy their shit. But stop
> crying...
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ken Murray <kmurray at pol.net> wrote:
>
> > Eric, that was a great post, and summarized my thinking perfectly.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pct-L mailing list
> > Pct-L at backcountry.net
> > To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
> > http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> >
> > List Archives:
> > http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
> > All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.
> > Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-L mailing list
> Pct-L at backcountry.net
> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
> List Archives:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
> All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.
> Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.
>
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list