[pct-l] bear bagging

Kevin hikelite at gmail.com
Sun Jan 2 02:10:34 CST 2011


Hi Melanie

Here is the latest update from Ursack. I wish they would approve them. The weight difference is huge. I think the agencies managing the backcountry are not taking into account the hikers when making their decisions about what is acceptable food protection. Yes, a bear could probably get into an Ursack eventually. Do we need the 100% impenetrability of a rigid container? I don't think so, but it's not up to me. I hung my food for many years without trouble. Ill probably have a canister between KM and Echo Lakes, but it's not by choice. 

http://www.ursack.com/ursack-update.htm

I haven't yet decided to borrow, rent, or buy. I'm still hoping the Ursack will be approved for the small sections it's not yet allowed. What they aren't taking into consideration is how important my food is to me! They base their tests on allowing a bear unlimited attempts to get the food. When I hear the bear trying to get my food, you can be sure I will defend it! When I used to hang my food, I would put a pile of "bear rocks" next to me at night. I have yet to meet a bear that thinks my food is worth getting pelted with rocks. They will just move on to an easier reward. Bears are big, but they still retreat when you throw stones. Now that I think about it, I bet that would work for pesky rangers asking about me bear can. ;) I'm kidding about that last part, but it does make a point. HEHE

I will reluctantly comply with the regulations, even if I don't like them. 


Misspellings and typos brought to you by iPhone.

On Jan 1, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Melanie Clarke <melaniekclarke at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear PCT, or Chuck,
> 
> Why is the Ursack illegal?  I loved the Ursack.
> 
> Melanie
> 
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 6:24 PM, CHUCK CHELIN <steeleye at wildblue.net> wrote:
> 
>> Good evening, Mike,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It is very rare to see any PCT hiker bag/hang food – anywhere.  Doing so is
>> not allowed as a substitute for using an approved bear ‘can in designated
>> areas.  The last time I bagged/hung food was on an Ontario canoe trip many
>> years ago.  Usually I ditch the ‘can at Echo Summit south of Lake Tahoe,
>> but
>> once I did carry a non-approved Ursack for a while north of there because
>> there were some curious bears in that general area.  Even then I didn't
>> hoist it up; I just tethered it at ground level to a small tree.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On the remainder of the PCT north there are lots of bears but they keep
>> their heads down and a hiker will be lucky to see one.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Steel-Eye
>> 
>> Hiking the Pct since before it was the PCT – 1965
>> 
>> http://www.trailjournals.com/steel-eye
>> 
>> http://www.trailjournals.com/SteelEye09
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Michael Pinkus <mikepinkus at hotmail.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> So, bear cannisters are required on some parts of the trail, I'm assuming
>>> that you bear bag it on the rest of the trail? I only ask this as I've
>> never
>>> read anything about it anywhere. We bear bag everywhere here in Canada
>>> unless you are camping when they're hibernating.
>>> 
>>> anyone?
>>> 
>>> cheers,
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pct-L mailing list
>>> Pct-L at backcountry.net
>>> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
>>> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>>> 
>>> List Archives:
>>> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pct-L mailing list
>> Pct-L at backcountry.net
>> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
>> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>> 
>> List Archives:
>> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-L mailing list
> Pct-L at backcountry.net
> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> 
> List Archives:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/



More information about the Pct-L mailing list