[pct-l] FW: Sleeping Pads

Wed Feb 16 18:46:12 CST 2011

Kevin – I have done that in the past but I think I am a ground guy going
forward.  Thanks

  _____  

From: Kevin Cook [mailto:hikelite at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:31 AM
To: CHUCK CHELIN
Cc: dnielsen at djmurphycompany.com; pct-l at backcountry.net
Subject: Re: [pct-l] FW: Sleeping Pads

Another answer... don't sleep on the ground. I switched to hammocks several
years ago and will never go back. Granted, I don't mind sleeping on the
ground, and bought a new NeoAir for my thru hike, but given the option, I'll
sleep hanging from the trees ;)

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:44 AM, CHUCK CHELIN <steeleye at wildblue.net> wrote:

Good morning, D.Nielsen,

This is probably not what you want to hear, but you may want to consider a
different approach.  As someone considerably older than you I know that with
age the body loses its flexibility and its ability to adapt, but another
reason the typical foam pad seems harder is because as the years accumulate
we probably sleep on the ground less often, becoming more and more
accustomed to the decadence of the bedroom.

I have several RidgeRest and Z-Rest pads but I find they are overkill in
terms of size and weight.  Instead I typically hike with a cheap-o, ¾
length, 3/8” closed-cell foam pad.  Insulation is adequate, and adapting to
that level of cushioning – or lack thereof -- is relatively simple and easy:
During the months prior to a hike I sleep every night on a carpeted floor
rather than in a cushy bed.  When the day arrives that I begin hiking the
transition to ground-sleeping on a thin pad is nearly seamless.

Prior to a hike most of us train our legs to hike with a pack; preferably we
train our lungs to process thin, high-altitude air; we harden our feet on
rough trails; we adjust our dining expectations to adapt to common trail
food; we carry training packs that often weigh more than our hiking packs to
develop our shoulders; we probably drink far more water than does a
sedentary person; and we accept a much lower bar-height of personal hygiene.
In order to save considerable weight, bulk, cost, and frailty, why not train
one’s self to adapt to our proposed sleeping environment?  The typical
answer is, “Oh, I couldn’t possibly do that.  I need my rest!”

Steel-Eye

Hiking the Pct since before it was the PCT – 1965

http://www.trailjournals.com/steel-eye

http://www.trailjournals.com/SteelEye09

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, <dnielsen at djmurphycompany.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _____

>
> From: dnielsen at djmurphycompany.com [mailto:dnielsen at djmurphycompany.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 9:22 AM
> To: 'pct-1 at backcountry.net'
> Subject: Sleeping Pads
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Looking for suggestions on sleeping pads for a back that is going on 50
and
> has some miles on it.  Currently use full length Ridge Rest but it seems
> harder all the time.  I am willing to carry a little extra weight on this
> item in order to sleep better.  I like the durability of the Ridge Rest
and
> hate to give it up.  Was thinking of coupling a short ProLite  with it as
I
> need the cushion at my hips and chest but need some padding at my knees
and
> want insulation full length. Would like to know if anyone has tried this
or
> have other suggestions, particularly if you are in my age group and/or
have
> back issues.  Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-L mailing list
> Pct-L at backcountry.net
> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
> List Archives:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
>
_______________________________________________
Pct-L mailing list
Pct-L at backcountry.net
To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l

List Archives:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/