[pct-l] Antishock Trekking Poles
CHUCK CHELIN
steeleye at wildblue.net
Sun Apr 10 09:20:40 CDT 2011
Good morning, Eric,
I’m with Shroomer, Yoshihiro, and probably a minority of other long-distance
hikers: I don’t like the trekking pole anti-shock feature. I say
“minority” because my impression is that’s the case. I speculate many
select anti-shock poles because they don’t really think about it, or don’t
have the experience to guide a choice. Besides, marketers and peddlers
strongly favor this lucrative up-sell.
Some of my reasoning can be seen at:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/2010-December/044063.html
Steel-Eye
Hiking the Pct since before it was the PCT – 1965
http://www.trailjournals.com/steel-eye
http://www.trailjournals.com/SteelEye09
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Eric Cook <ericccook at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi, I have been wondering if more long distance hikers prefer to have
> anti-shock, shock absorbing, Trekking Poles or if it ends up just being a
> problem? I am just trying to make a decision on the poles. Thanks for any
> advice.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-L mailing list
> Pct-L at backcountry.net
> To unsubcribe, or change options visit:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
> List Archives:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
>
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list