[pct-l] CDC recommendations for water treatment
Wes Rose
wb104475 at sbcglobal.net
Fri Oct 22 14:41:08 CDT 2010
Michael,
Great post. Thanks for the info. What are your thoughts on 90lb packs? (just kidding)
Wes
[pct-l] CDC recommendations for water treatment
Michael michael at leftcoastman.com
Fri Oct 22 13:22:55 CDT 2010
. Previous message: [pct-l] CDC recommendations for water treatment
. Next message: [pct-l] Water treatment
. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is my first time posting to this list, figuring I should take time reading it and understanding the "culture" of it. I'm planning on taking a couple of years out of the rat race and ride my motorcycle everywhere, and do a thruhike of the PCT next spring.
But the back and forth on water sterilization is driving me a bit crazy, and I wanted to make a few points. First, my bonafides: I have advanced degrees in medicine and biology, and I am now in the medical products industry at an executive level. So, I'm very familiar with how companies market their products.
1. I reviewed the articles at Steripens. I agree with the comment that just because a company provides links to a variety of publications on its website doesn't indicate a conspiracy. That's poor logic. That being said, after my review of the "published" articles on Steripen's website, their information is a bit disingenuous. Most of the articles were not published in peer-reviewed journals and appeared (though they didn't disclose it) to be funded by Steripens just so they could brag about it. That's bad science. The one article that was published in a peer reviewed journal didn't give the results that I would consider to be supportive of the view that Steripens is useful. It showed that 3.8% of oocytes sporulated (that's going to make you ill) in highly contaminated water. In less contaminated water, the Steripens killed 100%, so that's good. Boiling was still the best, and some of the alternative methods, like some of the cheaper non-ceramic water filters aren't worth the trouble. If I were to make a conclusion, I'd say that the Steripens does a great job, with caveats that in highly contaminated water, you might need to take more time.
2. The CDC is one of the greatest institutions in the US. They are utterly unbiased, only concerned about disease control, and run by people in the US Military and the US Public Health Service. They use great science and publish their reviews. Without them, we'd be overrun by diseases that would reduce our average lifespan by 20-30 years. I read over the website, and they clearly state that UV light "may not be designed to remove Crypto". It is my opinion, and again, reviewing the data provided by Steripens, they have provided sufficient evidence that it would remove it. However, and anyone reading this should understand, it is far from perfect. I would be extra careful in areas that might have Crypto (love the word) contamination, like anywhere there are cattle.
3. Someone stated that why worry about Crypto, you get it and you're over it. Well, for a few days, you're not going to retain enough calories to do any serious exertion. And in some people it becomes more serious. I'm a firm supporter in prevention rather than cure, because every medical procedure, every disease has a known significant risk. Most people might not die of Crypto, but some will, and it's easily prevented.
I know everyone cherishes their biases and opinions. It's like using Wikipedia, which ranks amongst the worst things that's happened to medical science, publishing junk that has no standing in science or basic logic. If you review the evidence, then you can use Wikipedia. The same here. Steripens works. It's not perfect, and anyone who pretends that its perfect, puts their health at risk. But if you're armed with the knowledge that in areas of serious contamination might require you to do something else.
I'm sorry that my first post here was a missive, but I wanted to provide some info that I believed would be helpful.
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list