[pct-l] Dogs on trail

[Andrew Jones]

True, but people who own dogs pay taxes. Plus, I didn't mention the impact
of pack stock on the backcountry. My dog is MUCH less destructive, and the
last I heard, mules don't pay taxes either. (If I'm wrong on this, does
anybody have a mule for sale?)

Andy


On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM, JD Schaefer <jdrows at gmail.com> wrote:

> People are allowed because they pay taxes, dogs don't.
> JD
>
>
>
> Andrew Jones wrote:
>
>> Fuzz-
>>
>> I can understand the large national parks - I actually agree that dogs
>> shouldn't be allowed in the backcountry. They probably do disturb wildlife
>> -
>> that said, I guess people shouldn't really be allowed out there either, if
>> you truly want to maintain a natural setting! You could use the same logic
>> to exclude dogs from wilderness areas and some national forest land, since
>> much of this is just as secluded as national park backcountry.
>>
>>
>>
>
>