[pct-l] How flat is So Cal?
Rob Rathmann
carcinomad at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 10:41:13 CST 2008
You can check out the elevation/grade by section here:
http://www.bearcant.org/elevation.php
I started without poles, but ended up buying them in Idyllwild after
experiencing some serious knee pain. They saved my hike.
bearcan't
On Jan 9, 2008 8:41 PM, Eric Payne <vaporjourney at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking about not getting my trekking poles until Kennedy Meadows. I
> typically always use trekking poles when there is lots of tricky eleveation
> gain, but I have a mental image of most of the PCT (especially socal) being
> very graded. How wrong am I? I definitely want the poles for the sketchy
> fords in the Sierra, and then I'll keep them beyond that. I can just
> remember all of the times on the AT when I hated using them on flat
> sections. They seemed sort of like a waste of time in those sections, and I
> didn't like using the energy to swing them...it felt unnatural and just
> something else to pay attention to. Can you say lazy? Still...it also
> seems that it would use less energy, thus calories, thus less water in
> socal.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> To unsubscribe or change list options (digest, etc):
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
>
--
my 2005 walk from mexico to canada: http://bearcant.org/
my photos: http://www.pbase.com/carcinomad/
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list