[pct-l] Lightening Rods....

Campy campydog at verizon.net
Mon Dec 31 17:12:13 CST 2007


It's the skin effect with lightning which matters 'cause of its strong  
AC components. The direct current resistance of various materials  
doesn't factor in as strongly at 10 khz to 1 MHz. A copper rod or a  
tree presents roughly the same attraction in the case of a leader  
stroke.
==^=== Campy

http://www.trailprojects.com
http://www.trailvolunteer.com (Mirror)

Time spent doing trail work shall not be deducted from your life!
===^==

On Dec 31, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Daniel Bailey wrote:

> I stand corrected!  This makes sense given that the majority of high  
> end cookware has a copper base.  At the same time, there have been a  
> few times where I've used a titanium mug and found the surface too  
> hot to drink from only to set the mug down and find that my drink is  
> cold a few minutes later.
>
> With the higher resistance of titanium, applying Ohms law (voltage =  
> current * resistance) leads me to expect that the current across a  
> titanium rod would be higher than an aluminum rod.  And it's  
> electric current that kills, not the voltage as some would believe.
>
> Of course, given the high voltage in a typical bolt of lightening,  
> the current through either an aluminum or titanium rod would be more  
> than I'd voluntarily withstand.
>
> Be well,
>
> Senator

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/attachments/20071231/2239a9ce/attachment.html 


More information about the Pct-L mailing list