[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pct-l] LNT-(small)"flame"(of short duration)



The trail Nazis have this one right.  Rules are their big thing!

At 10:03 AM 5/6/1998 -0700, Birgitte Jensen wrote:
> 
>> a  small cook fire should not be confused with a traditional
>>   campfire due to the extremely small amount of wood
>>   used and the short duration of the fire. No LNT flames  please.....
>
>   Sorry, an open-fire is an open-fire according to the FS and general
>common-sense. No "confusion" there. Obviously, subjective variables like
>"small amounts" of wood, "short" durations of flame, "traditonal" or
>new-fangled, (or whether the purpose is to cook-a-meal or
>warm-the-backside or soul) can't be optional in determining whether to
>build a fire in a No Fires zone, for instance - c'mon :->.....        bj
>   
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
>Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List | For info
http://www.hack.net/lists *
>
>

--
Dave Gomberg	mailto:gomberg@wcf.com
FormMaestro  <http://www.wcf.com>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *

==============================================================================