[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] More Fees.
- Subject: [pct-l] More Fees.
- From: Ken Marlow <kmarlow@ngs.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 97 08:24:00 -0500
- Organization: National Geographic
- Reply-to: <kmarlow@ngs.org>
Short and simple. When the NPS increased, or implemented new fees for many
of the National Park units, the idea (and what I told park patrons as a
ranger) was that the money was staying in the Park Service. Only problem was,
Congress found that this was a great source of revenue and was using alot
of these monies for other purposes. If it stayed in the parks, then user
fees for NPS backcountry areas wouldn't be necessary. Who's to say, (that
even, again, they're saying) the money will stay in the park! Nothing like
triple-dipping: taxes, entrance fees, backcountry fees. Let's not forget the
outrageous fee schedule at the Grand Canyon, a leader fee, and a per day fee
(plus the entrance fee for the park?)
* From the Pacific Crest Trail Email List | For info http://www.hack.net/lists *
==============================================================================