[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Bifocal Sunglasses
- Subject: [pct-l] Bifocal Sunglasses
- From: wpsnotebook at charter.net (Richard Woods)
- Date: Sat Feb 25 16:29:27 2006
- In-reply-to: <20060224145601.5AC8B1D25B@edina.hack.net>
- References: <20060224145601.5AC8B1D25B@edina.hack.net>
I know what you mean. Last summer I lost my reading glasses on the
south side of Dick's Pass, must have been when I was switching from
map reading back to sunglasses at the Gilmore Lake junction. I got
lucky and found someone's glasses in Middle Velma Lake the next
morning. Half of their prescription was almost right for me.
I have a pair of sunglasses with a bifocal section at the bottom, but
found they were really uncomfortable when hiking. I get a stiff neck
trying to watch my feet over the bifocal part. I don't use them for
backpacking now - $150 wasted for that purpose. I bought them
originally because I'm a landscape painter, and wanted eye protection
out in the field. I was stumbling a lot on the trail, so I tried an
experiment. I turned them over so the bifocal part was on top. That
actually was more comfortable for walking, and not really much of a
hassle to adapt to to read a map. Wasn't comfortable for the long
term, but I'll order a pair with the reading section at the top if I
ever lose these.
Rick
On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:56 AM, pct-l-request@mailman.backcountry.net
wrote:
> From: Slyatpct@aol.com
> Date: February 24, 2006 3:22:13 AM PST
> To: pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Subject: Re: [pct-l] Sunglasses for the glasses wearer?
>
>
> I need reading glasses for maps and guidebooks and it's a real pain to
> constantly switch from sun to reading, so I generally just go with
> the former when
> need be. Does anyone know of sunglasses with a reading lens on the
> bottom
> part?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sly
>