[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] HEET vs. DEET
- Subject: [pct-l] HEET vs. DEET
- From: dsaufley at sprynet.com (dsaufley@sprynet.com)
- Date: Wed Feb 8 13:42:57 2006
LOL! Thanks for a good belly laugh, Chuckie!
L-Rod
-----Original Message-----
>From: Chuckie V <rubberchuckie@yahoo.com>
>Sent: Feb 8, 2006 8:03 AM
>To: PCT-List <pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
>Subject: [pct-l] HEET vs. DEET
>
>Damn, that was my problem; I used 100% HEET. They're both known carcinogens so I figured they'd work the same.
>
> Is anyone else here more fearful of chemicals than mosquitoes?
>
> CV
>
> >>>>I completed a maritime survival course in Alaska (I Survived in '85). One topic was insect repellent. One fact I'm sure of is that the effectiveness of Deet-based repellents coincides with the percentage of deet in them. In Alaska, where mosquitos should have fuselage numbers, the only truly effective repellant is 100% deet. From personal experience, don't bother with cans, creams, sprays, with anything less than 100% deet.
>
>_______________________________________________
>pct-l mailing list
>pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
>unsubscribe or change options:
>http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l