[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Re: Snow questions
- Subject: [pct-l] Re: Snow questions
- From: e_lehman at theory.csail.mit.edu (Eric Lehman)
- Date: Tue Apr 12 14:30:23 2005
- In-reply-to: <20050412170044.439031D0C1@edina.hack.net>
- References: <20050412170044.439031D0C1@edina.hack.net>
Hi,
I'm sure you've looked at the excellent PCT post-holer site. For another
perspective, you can look at my site:
http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~e_lehman/uty.html
Essentially, I've taken this year's snow record up to today and pasted on
melt records from this day forward from 35 previous years. I update daily
and the range of uncertainty-- while still large-- is slowly dropping.
Of course, something completely unprecedented *could* happen; the graph
only shows you the range of things that *have* happened.
At the extremes, a once-in-a-decade fast melt could leave us only slightly
above normal snow levels. On the other hand, the melt patterns in about
15% of years would put us FIVE WEEKS behind schdule. Overall, it looks to
me like we'll be 1-3 weeks behind normal. So this suggests that June 27th
is a reasonable date for a rough plan.
/Eric
P.S. Someone suggested I compute a mean and std. dev. for the day when
all snow is gone. I liked this idea a lot, but got stuck because we
haven't had to melt off this much snow most years. So a lot of the curves
don't drop all the way to zero. I couldn't think of a good way to cope
with that, so I've just left the graph for "eyeballing".
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:51:14 -0400
> From: medusaj@aol.com
> Subject: [pct-l] Snow questions
>
> So. In planning an itinerary to leave with our support person, snow
> becomes a factor. If my calculations are correct, actual "Ray Day" is
> not June 15 this year, but June 27 (June 1 + [90.1/3.5]). [...]
>
> My questions are: [...]
>
> 2. How realistic are Ray's calculations? Would you recommend we use
> the June 27 date as our estimated Kennedy Meadows departure date? Or
> June 15? July 15? August 31?