[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
- Subject: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
- From: kraig.mottar at verizon.net (Kraig Mottar)
- Date: Fri Jan 7 19:17:30 2005
You may be right. Though, for long trips, more weight will be neccessary. Though, as time goes on and I get into better shape, more weight might be a challenge. I will probably do as you say, and start with 20 lbs and increase as my fitness increases.
Happy trails,
Kraig
> From: Slyatpct@aol.com
> Date: 2005/01/07 Fri PM 03:35:01 PST
> To: kraig.mottar@verizon.net, Trekker4@aol.com, pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
> Subject: Re: [pct-l] Pack weight to body weight ratio...
>
> In a message dated 1/6/2005 8:12:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> kraig.mottar@verizon.net writes:
>
> > In the end I'll probably settle on a %age of body weight.
> >
> >
>
> That's an antiquated formula.
>
> The best way to get back into backpacking is get to 20 lbs or less (without
> food and water) and then lighten up from there. It's not all that hard and not
> all that more expensive. Whatever the cost, the less weight, the less wear
> and tear on the body.
>
> Sly