[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mountain Dave's wish list! & RE: [pct-l] camera phones



With the right subsampling/compression math 4MB might boil down'
to 2.3 or so without loss of quality.

Sampling is done such that all white areas are not sent for exmaple,
only the coordinates of white areas of the pic..saving a bunch..

I am on the cuttting edge of this in my work-- and we are a **LOT** closer
to it that you'd imagine.

 Mountain Dave's wish list included:

picture phone was also a PDA including altimeter, compass, 
map/guide book data base, pedometer, GPS, diary, watch, worked on AA
batteries and 
weighed only 4 ounces, I would get one

Well for starters: Next gen of cell phones (now actually!!)
will have GPS builtin (under 4 oz!)
and that will give you soon after that is released- an altimeter, compass, 
pedometer and basic watch. Right now you have PDA's with a kinda-sorta-cell 
connection accessory that is soooo close to a cell phone...soon is the operative
keyword here...remember when it was a dream to see a pic on ANY phone, no less
a self-contained battery powered unit-- that was only 3 years ago!

For example At 06:14 PM 11/13/03 -0000, Richard Hare wrote:
>Dave
>
>I think you might find that the quality may be inferior with these camera
>phones.  I'm not really at the cutting edge of them, but I'm pretty sure
>they only take 640 x 480 which is fine for simple picture messages on a
>phone and even may look kind of okay on a web page (here's one a friend of
>mine took on his camera phone
>http://www.richardhare.net/photos/image(45).jpg ) Even if the lenses were
>any good and the phone could take a 4mp shot  I doubt there's a  network
>around at present which would cope with sending such large amounts of data.
>(or even a backpackers pocket deep enough to stay connected whilst it gets
>sent)
>
>Maybe one day! It would certainly be a neat way to go!
>
>Rik
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net
>> [mailto:pct-l-bounces@mailman.backcountry.net]On Behalf Of
>> CMountainDave@aol.com
>> Sent: 13 November 2003 16:28
>> To: pct-l@backcountry.net
>> Subject: [pct-l] camera phones
>>
>>
>> Just read an article in Time magazine that may solve the what to
>> do with your
>> digital images while still on the trail: Camera phones. Although
>> the phone
>> probably won't work in mountain valley you can e-mail them to a
>> computer when
>> you get to a trail town where reception is available. Your
>> pictures will be
>> awaiting you on your return neatly filed. Have a friend confirm
>> it for you, or
>> send them to their computer too, as back up.
>>  Now if this picture phone was also a PDA including altimeter, compass,
>> map/guide book data base, pedometer, GPS, diary, watch, worked on
>> AA batteries and
>> weighed only 4 ounces, I would get one
>>    Almost forgot, It's gotta be at least 4 mp to satisfy the
>> pixel nit pickers
>> _______________________________________________
>> pct-l mailing list
>> pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
>> unsubscribe or change options:
>> http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pct-l mailing list
>pct-l@mailman.backcountry.net
>unsubscribe or change options:
>http://mailman.hack.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
>