[pct-l] Re: [at-l] Still looking for someone with a network... (admin)

[ryan@hack.net (Ryan K. Brooks)]

I've had a few other offers as well and would prefer not to take folks'
money for the upkeep of the lists.  The price seems fair, so let's keep
this as a last resort option.

Thank you for checking into this,

R


Dave Hicks wrote:
> If no one has come forward, I have an idea that might work.
>
> I don't have the facilities and am not able to fund a co-location by myself.
> However, I would be willing to go shares with some of the other list
> members, if we can find a location at a rate that we can afford.
>
> My local ISP has co-location rates (currently unpublished) starting at
> $110/month, which includes power and up to 384k worth of bandwidth.  A 19"
> rack-mountable chassis is required and must be less than 4U (7 inches) high.
>
> Ryan, would something like this work for you?
>
> Any others know of a better deal?
>
> Any others willing to pitch in?
>
> Chainsaw
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan K. Brooks" <ryan@hack.net>
> To: <at-l@backcountry.net>; <pct-l@backcountry.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:49 AM
> Subject: [at-l] Still looking for someone with a network... (admin)
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm still looking for someone who could provide connectivity to my
> backup dns and mail server.   This machine only uses bandwidth if my
> connection goes down.   Basically, I'm asking for:
>
> - A 10 or 100 meg ethernet port
> - A single static IP, not behind a firewall (or behind a firewall with
> SSH, SMTP, tcp/udp 53-DNS and outbound wide open).
> - AC power for a small Sun server.  I can provide a UPS if power is
> unreliable.
> - Relatively stable location (i.e. at a solid job, unlike mine :-), or
> at someone's home 24x7 static connection)
> - Minimum of 128kbps symmetric bandwidth available.
> - Not on a network using Charter Communications or Time Warner Telecom
> for primary transit.
>
> This would really help out the lists, as I've had to move both my
> primary and backup DNS/MX to the same location.   This will require no
> local work on your part, as these servers are extremely reliable and
> have uptimes exceeding one year.  Worst case, in the event of  a
> hardware failure I would simply send out new equipment.
>
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
> Stay on topic!
>
>