Re: [pct-l] Re: Defiant rancher once more loses grazing case, may now go to jail

There's another important distinction: the rancher (or the logger or miner)
have a lasting detrimental impact on the land. This adversely affects
everyone else who might want to use "their" land. Why should the rancher be
allowed to use the land without charge and without regulation just because
it belongs to us/the government?

----- Original Message -----