[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pct-l] PCT verses AT
- Subject: Re: [pct-l] PCT verses AT
- From: Stephen Martin <troubadour@pcthiker.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:05:48 -0700
I've thru hiked both the AT and the PCT. A lot of people asked me to campare
the two to one another. I would always reply that I thought mile for mile I
considered the AT to be harder hiking.
When I started out on the PCT and read sections of the guide that called for
steep trail I imagined the steep hand over foot climbs the AT offered. I was
quite happy to find that the PCT is graded in a more gentle manner and that
what was called steep in the guide didn't feel that way to me. From that
standpoint I felt like I had a mental advantage.
I'm not saying there aren't steep sections of the PCT because there are.
However, over all I found the PCT to be a better graded trail. And the
senery doens't compare. There is usually a wonderful pay off for a big climb
on the PCT while on the AT one toils many ups and downs without a single
view.
Troubadour
--------------
http://www.pcthiker.com | experience the pacific crest trail
* From the PCT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================