[pct-l] Phone Charging

[Ed Jarrett]

Interesting, but they do not appear to be rechargeable.

Ed Jarrett (Eeyore)A Clay Jar: http://aclayjar.blogspot.com/  Twitter: https://twitter.com/EdJarrett53 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ed.jarrett.71 

Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:45:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Phone Charging
From: rgraybill44 at gmail.com
To: edjarrett at msn.com
CC: pct-l at backcountry.net

If these light weight Mini-Power batteries make it to the market they may be just the thing for hikers.  They have already won a design award:http://www.red-dot.sg/en/online-exhibition/concept/?code=1269&y=2014&c=17&a=0
See also:http://gajitz.com/emergency-power-paper-micro-batteries-for-mobile-phones/
Ronald D. Graybill
11832 Fordham PlaceRiverside, CA  92505rgraybill44 at gmail.com
909-910-9339

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Ed Jarrett <edjarrett at msn.com> wrote:
I used a Suntatics panel last August in the North Cascades, and it worked well, even later in the day.  Obviously it would do better further south and at noon, but it was far from useless.



Ed Jarrett (Eeyore)A Clay Jar: http://aclayjar.blogspot.com/  Twitter: https://twitter.com/EdJarrett53 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ed.jarrett.71



> From: rbelshee at hotmail.com

> To: pct-l at backcountry.net

> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:24:45 -0800

> Subject: Re: [pct-l] Phone Charging

>

> > All things being equal, with only temperature as a variable , solar output

> > is greater when temperature is colder.

> > So what is the basis that your output might be greater in summer?

>

> More radiant solar energy is available per square foot in summer time. There

> are fancy graphs of solar radiant energy available, but here are a few

> basics relevant to the PCT thru-hiker:

> - peak at solar noon (sun highest in sky), majority of energy is in a window

> just a few hours each side of solar noon)

> - strongest at summer solstice, weakest at winter solstice (early May to

> early Sep is good)

> - stronger in the south, weaker in the north

> - diminished by clouds (full sun is obviously best, though I have been able

> to charge a little on lightly cloudy days)

> - open view to sky required (duh)

>

> Because of the last four on the list, chargers in Washington are useless,

> and in most of Oregon they are dubious. But they are great for the first

> 1700-1800 miles, especially when you take a siesta in the heat of the day in

> southern California and can charge up rapidly.

>

> Aligning to the sun is also a variable. The available radiation at a 45

> degree angle is about 70% of that when aligned perfectly, and actual panels

> tend to perform a bit worse than that.  Best to keep within 30 degrees,

> where close to 90% of the maximum radiation is available.

>

> So, you are right that all things being equal, cold temperature is better.

> But unfortunately in solar calculation all things are never equal.

>

> -- Steady

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Pct-L mailing list

> Pct-L at backcountry.net

> To unsubscribe, or change options visit:

> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l

>

> List Archives:

> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/

> All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.

> Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.



_______________________________________________

Pct-L mailing list

Pct-L at backcountry.net

To unsubscribe, or change options visit:

http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l



List Archives:

http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/

All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.

Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.