[pct-l] PCT Elevation gain/loss Stats
Paint Your Wagon
n801yz at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 23 21:48:22 CST 2014
Timberline,
Since Half Mile uses half mile increments,
why wouldn’t the GPS give data (gains and loses reconciled against each
other) for each half mile,
and have the ability to keep cumulative data for the entire trail?
Put another way-
the GPS determines when a half mile has been reached;
whether the trail hiked was flat or vertical switchbacks,
so... there is bound to be some accountability as to gains and loses within
that distance.
I would think that the sophistication of a current GPS is at least that
proficient.
One’s position from point A to point B would have to be determined by more
than a one dimensional (as a crow flys) measurement/distance.
Let me try another example...
hiking a flat trail for a half mile,
versus scaling a ladder (theoretically) straight up-
that is also a half mile in length.
Now; portray the distance traveled, on a map using the GPS data.
First off, the starting point and ending point would be nearly on top of
each other,
meaning the GPS took the elevation gain into consideration.
Climbing a vertical ladder 1/8 of a mile in height,
followed by a flat hike of 1/4 of a mile in length,
followed by a 45 degree descent,
would yield a different representation on a map,
as compared to the previous example.
Wouldn't the GPS keep track of all that?
<>Paint<>
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list