[pct-l] Alcohol and Esbit Stoves

Wed Apr 9 15:41:06 CDT 2014

Didn’t say it was; I was speaking of and only of an esbit stove.  And accidents can happen with any stove.  

From: tsparks56 at aol.com 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 4:33 PM
To: jplynch at crosslink.net ; brick at brickrobbins.com ; pct-l at backcountry.net 
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Alcohol and Esbit Stoves

How is a tipped over alcohol stove under anyone's control? 

-----Original Message-----
From: JPL <jplynch at crosslink.net>
To: brick <brick at brickrobbins.com>; pct-l <pct-l at backcountry.net>; tsparks56 <tsparks56 at aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Alcohol and Esbit Stoves

Its fine to understand the dictionary definition of terms, but laws and 
regulations will sometimes have their own definitions and a more detailed 
explanation of what something means than strictly relying on the dictionary. 
Brick is right on target in seeking more definitive answers.  I use an esbit 
tablet stove.  Its under my control.  When I'm ready, I blow out the tab.  I 
could argue that the esbit stove and tablet are fully under my control.  But 
I realize that the agency governing the land where I am may have a different 
understanding and I'm fine with that.  Just tell me.

-----Original Message----- 
From: tsparks56 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 4:25 PM
To: brick at brickrobbins.com ; pct-l at backcountry.net
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Alcohol and Esbit Stoves

Brick, at first I thought the problem was a reading comprehension problem 
but, now I think it's more of a misunderstanding of what the word  "control' 
is defined as, for this application.  To help you along, I have taken the 
liberty of providing a copy of the definition of "control" for you.

conÃ‚Â·trol
  [kuhn-trohl]  Show IPA

verb (used with object), conÃ‚Â·trolled, conÃ‚Â·trolÃ‚Â·ling.
1.
to exercise restraint or direction over; dominate; command.

2.
to hold in check; curb: to control a horse; to control one's emotions.

3.
to test or verify (a scientific experiment) by a parallel experiment or 
other standard of comparison.

4.
to eliminate or prevent the flourishing or spread of: to control a forest 
fire.

5.
Obsolete . to check or regulate (transactions), originally by means of a 
duplicate register.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/control

Brick, if you think I'm being an ass about this, it is because you, as the 
moderator of this list should hold yourself to a higher standard for 
everyone to follow, especially when it comes to safety issues and, if need 
be, error on the side of caution and common sense. If you don't completely 
understand the wording of this BLM order, all that needs to be understood, 
of which I do, is to understand the intent of the BLM directive.
If you want to play games with the wording and pretend you don't understand 
something as important as this, please keep it to yourself.  As for you 
being the moderator of this board, I beg you to present yourself to having a 
higher standard, especially for the very inexperienced hikers among us to 
follow.
We don't need an accidental fire on the trail and I don't want to attend 
anymore Fire Fighters funerals.

Thank you,

Terry Sparks
34 years, Los Angeles County Fire Department (retired)

-----Original Message-----
From: Brick Robbins <brick at brickrobbins.com>
To: pct-l <pct-l at backcountry.net>
Sent: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Alcohol and Esbit Stoves

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Ken Murray <kmurray at dr.com> wrote:
>  *Setting, building, maintaining, attending, or using open fire of any 
> kind is
prohibited in the*
>  *designated area. *Controlled flame devices such as portable stoves 
> fueled by
petroleum or LPG products
> are allowed only by permit.
>
> Brick, you left out the first sentence. The second sentence provides an
exception to the first. Alcohol and Esbit would clearly be banned, because
neither runs on "Petroleum or LPG products"

And you left out the words "SUCH AS" which does not strictly limit the
type of stoves to "Petroleum or LPG products" but merely uses them as
examples.

I don't think the PCTA should have changed the words "SUCH AS" to "ONLY."

> I think this is crystal clear. Brick, if you don't, why don't you call the 
> BLM
and ask for clarification?

I did. The person who answered the phone didn't know, and was going to
get back to me. I'm still waiting.

My beef with this is that laws and regulation should be clear.

The USFS order clearly mandates stoves with a shutoff valve. The BLM
order does not.  Some  folks are assuming that "controlled flame"
means the same as "has a shutoff valve" without a really good basis.
_______________________________________________
Pct-L mailing list
Pct-L at backcountry.net
To unsubscribe, or change options visit:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l

List Archives:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.
Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.

_______________________________________________
Pct-L mailing list
Pct-L at backcountry.net
To unsubscribe, or change options visit:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l

List Archives:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
All content is copyrighted by the respective authors.
Reproduction is prohibited without express permission. 