[pct-l] PCTRI response to the Forest Service upholding PCT mountain biking closure

[Dan Welch]

You forgot to include folks like Nick spending their time trolling in hiker
forums - even though all he baccomplishes is solidifying opposition to the
very cause they espouse.  So he deserves our empathy.

Love,
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net [mailto:pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net]
On Behalf Of Ken Murray
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 1:45 AM
To: pct-l
Subject: [pct-l] PCTRI response to the Forest Service upholding PCT mountain
biking closure

I'm confused Mr. Murray....what "ruling" are you talking about? And what
"resources" and "money" is being
spent?=====================================================The "ruling" that
you want to change, that Congress meant what it said when it created the
PCT.Resources? How about attorney's to give opinions on the legality of USFS
positions? How about timespent writing letters by all these bikers? How
about the paid people in biker organizations spending their time on the
issue. How about YOU spending your time writing on blogs?The fact of the
matter is that you wanted a reconsideration, and you GOT a reconsideration.
But now, only a few months later, you are not happy that you got your
reconsideration, because YOU LOST. And your biker pals are pissed at you for
misleading them.You say it is tenuous, but you get no traction, you get no
results.====================There is no "ruling"====================Right.
The decision by the USFS does not exist. It is legal to ride on the
  PCT.Any other "truths" you want to pass onto your buddies????
_______________________________________________
Pct-L mailing list
Pct-L at backcountry.net
To unsubscribe, or change options visit:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l

List Archives:
http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
All content is copyrighted by the respective authors. 
Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.