[pct-l] PCTA statement about "Forest Service upholds PCT"

[Timothy Nye]

Is that my hat?  Please pass the salt.

Given the prevalence of the reference to the Supreme Court I went back and dug some more. Stroll was a Supreme Court staff attorney for a time until 2007, then he left for unknown reasons and assumed a staff counsel position for the Sixth District Court of Appeal, that's  the intermediate level of the appellate process between the trial court and the Supreme Court. 

I'm embarrassed. I dropped my initial inquiry after I found him at the Court of Appeal and assumed a mistake of fact confusing the two courts not guessing someone would go down in status in the hierarchy of the court system. 

I'm embarrassed. I guess I just proved the old saw about 'assume'.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 7, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Brick Robbins <brick at brickrobbins.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Timothy Nye <timpnye at gmail.com> wrote:
>> A perpetuated mistake. He is a 57 year old staff ( sorry, Mango) attorney for the 6 th Circuit Court of Appeal in San Jose.
> 
> I read that qualification many times in articles attributed to him.
> Thanks for setting the record straight.
> 
>> The ruling was bullet proof; hence the abandonment of the cause by legal means. Although, the employment would probably preclude Stroll from taking an active and public role.
> 
> please explain what you mean by this.
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-L mailing list
> Pct-L at backcountry.net
> To unsubscribe, or change options visit:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
> 
> List Archives:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/
> All content is copyrighted by the respective authors. 
> Reproduction is prohibited without express permission.