[pct-l] To flare or not to flare
Diane Soini of Santa Barbara Hikes
diane at santabarbarahikes.com
Fri Feb 11 09:07:50 CST 2011
It's fine if you want to bring a bunch of emergency stuff. I suppose
I just assumed that everyone understood the fire danger in
California. You will notice that almost the entire section of trail
from Campo to beyond Kennedy Meadows has been burned. You will walk
through more charred forest than you ever thought possible. In some
places you will notice that many of the trees are not returning.
Even if a road flare did something for you, it could be at the
expense of the forest and the watershed. So please, leave your flares
at home and spare the people of Southern California another summer of
pyrocumulus clouds mushrooming in the sky and ashes falling like
nuclear winter.
On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:12 PM, pct-l-request at backcountry.net wrote:
> Regarding to flare or not to flare,
>
> Honestly I feel my trail name should be "Paranoid" or something
> because I
> have a crazy imagination. I feel like I should be prepared for the
> worst
> case scenario, so that I live to tell the tale. Maybe a Spot would
> be a
> little safer than the flare tho. Regarding protection from bears,
> bear mace
> is a great idea. A gun or knife probably won't save you from
> animals and in
> most cases they will only aggravate the animal more. However, we
> are all
> critics and I like the saying "Hike your own hike" because I
> certainly will
> take whatever I feel will save me in worst case scenarios, while not
> breaking my back due to excess weight in my pack.
>
> Jamie
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list