[pct-l] What is a "Thru Hike?"

Mon Feb 23 01:04:45 CST 2009

To me, the ones that really fail are the ones that fail to start, not the
ones that fail to finish.

I've heard so many people say, "Wow. I've always wanted to hike the PCT.",
but do they REALLY want it so bad that they are willing to do what ever it
takes to make it happen? I only made it to the 2,000 mile mark, and had to
skip some areas due to fire. I also skipped a section in Northern
California but was able to get back on the trail after a couple zero days in
Ashland. At that point, I knew in my soul that there wasn't enough time left
to make it to Canada, but that didn't take away from making it as far as I
did.

I will say this: Don't forget to take some zero days! They are more
important than you may realize. For me, I think I would have made it further
if I would have taken a zero day once in a while rather than always trying
to get in my 23 miles per day every day to get to Canada by October 1st.

O. Ikem Sofar

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:13 PM, <ned at pacificcrestcustombuilders.com> wrote:

> Jeff brought up an interesting question,
>
> Is a Thru Hike still going from Border to Border in one shot?
> If you didn't make it all the way, did you just "Long Hike" or still Thru
> Hike?
>
> Do many of those who start really have the realistically educated
> motivation/desire to go all the way, or are they out there for a "taste" of
> the experience, or do they start with the dream and, because of
> insufficient/inadequate planning and unrealistic expectations, drop out
> along the way?
>
> Mtnned
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: jeff.singewald at comcast.net
>  To: ned at pacificcrestcustombuilders.com
>  Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:06 PM
>  Subject: Re: [pct-l] Trail Running Shoes so great?
>
>
>  Ned,
>
>
>
>  I think you are bringing some good questions to the list today.  The
> question of "why you are out there" is a very interesting one.  One thing
> that has bothered me to some degree over the last couple of years is the
> comments that people share that it is not their priority to complete the
> trail.  I think this is interesting, given that they claim they are
> thru-hiking the PCT.  Why has the term, thru-hiking, changed so much over
> the years?  Thru-hiking is defined as hiking the entire trail in one year,
> or at least those sections of the trail that are not closed to fires or
> other natural phenomena.  Heck, even the folks that I journaled for last
> year, still talk about their "thru-hike" even though they quit before
> finishing Oregon and skipped a number of trail miles in California.  That is
> simply not a thru-hike.  Even Diane of Santa Barbara talks about her
> "thru-hike".  She didn't finish California and today indicated that her
> original goal was to hike the California section.
>   That is a long hike but not a thru-hike by any means.
>
>
>
>  This motivation that you speak of is interesting.  You really do have to
> "want" to complete a thru-hike and prepare to complete a thru-hike in order
> to do it.  Your point about preparation goes on deaf ears often on this
> list.  I know for me this was a major reason why I DID complete a thru-hike
> in 2006.  Not a day, not one single day went by that I did not want to hike
> or thought about quitting.  Why?  Because I prepared and my #1 goal was to
> reach Canada.
>
>
>
>  Anyhow, take care,
>
>
>
>  Jeff/Elevator
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: ned at pacificcrestcustombuilders.com
>  To: "Diane at Santa Barbara Hikes dot com" <diane at santabarbarahikes.com>,
> pct-l at backcountry.net
>  Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:27:09 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
>  Subject: Re: [pct-l] Trail Running Shoes so great?
>
>  Fantastic, Diane! You hit the nail on the head.
>
>  I don't know if its the shoes that contribute to the low success rate or
> any
>  of a number of issues, some of which you've mentioned, but to help hikers
>  have a great, safe, healthy, and terrifically rewarding experience out on
>  the long trails, I'm questioning the accepted norm. Are the current trends
>  in training, food, gear, schedules, pace, etc. really allowing hikers a
>  better time in the wilderness?
>
>  I had an incredible time on the trail and want more people to have the
> kind
>  of experience you speak of, where you're prepared physically, mentally,
>  emotionally, and spiritually for all the trail has to offer. Some find
> what
>  they're looking for in themselves, in others, or in the spiritual and some
>  are out there for altogether other reasons. If you wanted to help hikers
> get
>  past the first few weeks or month and the calls of home, what would be
> your
>  advise?
>
>  Mtnned
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Diane at Santa Barbara Hikes dot com" <diane at santabarbarahikes.com
> >
>  To: <pct-l at backcountry.net>
>  Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:02 PM
>  Subject: Re: [pct-l] Trail Running Shoes so great?
>
>
>  >
>  > On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:23 PM, pct-l-request at backcountry.net wrote:
>  >> ned at pacificcrestcustombuilders.com wrote:
>  >>> I guess I'm still trying to figure out how come about 75% of thru
>  >>> hikers
>  >>> leave the trail....
>  > You think it's trail runners?
>  >
>  > People who leave the trail in the first couple of hundred miles
>  > probably were not prepared physically or mentally or both. People who
>  > have made it through the Sierra are probably feeling lonely for
>  > family and home and overwhelmed with how much distance is left to go.
>  >
>  > The PCT is more a mental game than a physical one. As soon as home
>  > starts calling you, if you can't find a reason to continue, you'll
>  > just go home.
>  >
>  > But don't think going home is a bad thing or a failure. Many of us go
>  > on the trail seeking a spiritual experience and once it has been had,
>  > we know the right time to go home.
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Pct-l mailing list
>  > Pct-l at backcountry.net
>  > http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>  >
>  > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>  > signature database 3875 (20090220) __________
>  >
>  > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>  >
>  > http://www.eset.com
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Pct-l mailing list
>  Pct-l at backcountry.net
>  http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
>
>
>
>  __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 3876 (20090221) __________
>
>  The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
>  http://www.eset.com
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>