[pct-l] unsupported
Rob Rathmann
carcinomad at gmail.com
Tue Jun 10 18:33:56 CDT 2008
i agree. however, when folks head out to break the 'unsupported pct
record', that dictates there must be a definition of 'unsupported' for
their attempt to be valid & meaningful. doesn't it? not that hiking
the pct at ANY pace isn't already both valid and meaningful...
bearcan't
--
my 2005 walk from mexico to canada: http://bearcant.org/
my photos: http://www.pbase.com/carcinomad/
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bob Bankhead <wandering_bob at comcast.net> wrote:
> My guess is "unsupported" means whatever the hiker wants it to mean. There is no "official definition" of which I'm aware.
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list