[pct-l] Pct-l Digest, Vol 4, Issue 18
AsABat
AsABat at 4Jeffrey.Net
Sun Jan 6 18:38:13 CST 2008
No, it makes more sense when you realize Greg misspelled intimately.
-----Original Message-----
Thank you Chris. I thought it was me..............
This this a post from Jack Daniels????
Huh?!?!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 4:28 pm, bighummel at aol.com wrote:
> It is pondering on legal issues that considering the status of
> copywrited material is conceivably, unconscientiously, unbelievably
> silly to take serious unless mutual parties of substantial interest
are
> intimitly involved in several dimensions of the standard postings.
> That said, a court, in your state or mine might find that unconscious
> bodies are literally falling forward to understand the stupidity of
> such a consideration.
>
> In my limited and twisted legal opinion,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/attachments/20080106/a79355e6/attachment.html
More information about the Pct-L
mailing list