[pct-l] Fwd: RE: Legal Ponderings......

[g l]

g l <gailpl2003 at yahoo.com> wrote: Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:45:27 -0800 (PST)
From: g l <gailpl2003 at yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [pct-l] Legal Ponderings......
To: Bob and Diana Nelson <benelson at ktc.com>

 HAHAHAHA, good one Bob!  Actually, as Brian said, he IS an attorney so his opinion carries more weight I think.

How can you tell when an attorney's hands are cold???  He has his hands in his OWN pockets!!!

Sorry Brian, we couldn't resist........

Wheeew

Bob and Diana Nelson <benelson at ktc.com> wrote:     Hi,
      It's been my experience that  with law the only important opinions are those you pay for.  Many folks try  to apply reasoning to situations that have no  inherent reason at all. The  only thing that matters is case law and only lawyers have knowledge of this. By the way do you know how to  get a lawyer out of a tree? Cut the rope.
  
 Bob
  
  
  -----Original Message-----
From: pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net   [mailto:pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net]On Behalf Of g l
Sent:  Sunday, January 06, 2008 4:47 PM
To: Patrick Beggan;  PCT
Subject: Re: [pct-l] Legal Ponderings......


 Absolutely correct.  I'll keep ignoring    yours...........

Patrick Beggan <meta474 at gmail.com>    wrote:        And your question was answered by another user. This is a communal,      group-conversation list. You have to expect people to chime in with their      opinions, wether they're a direct answer to your question or not. I find      that if something isn't directly helpful to me its very easy to just ignore      it.
     

     


          On Jan 6, 2008, at 5:35 PM, g l  wrote:

     The original question was not a question of what I        want or don't want, privacy issues or anything else.  It was a LEGAL        question.  Nothing more.  I can make my own decisions about the        other issues.

Wheeew



Andrea Dinsmore <zaqueltooocool at gmail.com>        wrote:                You would need to go back a couple months to the discussion of          collecting names from trail registers to put together as an ongoing          history of who hiked the trail over the years. Some hikers were for the          recorded history and some were against it. Those against felt it was an          invasion of their privacy and they didn't want anyone to know they had           been out here. Those who were for it were interested in having a          historic record of who was out there before and after they went through.          Also, as you said some felt it was a help in locating lost hikers. To          each his (or her) own. If you want privacy in the Internet world...don't          post your every move and thought for the world to see. If you want to be          invisible on the trail.....don't sign your name and don't tell other          hikers who you are. They might just write about
 you in their journal.          
          
         PCT          MOM
_______________________________________________
Pct-l          mailing list
Pct-l at backcountry.net
To          unsubscribe or change list options (digest,           etc):
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l



-Wheeew-
www.trailjournals.com/wheeew/
---->MexiCan---->    2008      

---------------------------------
   Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try    it now.


-Wheeew-
www.trailjournals.com/wheeew/
---->MexiCan----> 2008        

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.


-Wheeew-
www.trailjournals.com/wheeew/
---->MexiCan----> 2008
       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/attachments/20080106/1af715ca/attachment.html