[pct-l] hiking with a little dog

[Patrick Beggan]

Notably Wheeew also knows all about being rude.

This whole discussion is a waste of time and should just be dropped --  
I'd really like to not see anymore e-mails with this subject line in  
my inbox, as I put Wheeew on my blocker exactly so I wouldn't have to  
hear about little dogs on the trail and all associated topics.


On Feb 25, 2008, at 8:22 AM, stewjohns at comcast.net wrote:

> Rena Johnston writes:
>
> Her
> response makes me feel sad, apparently mine and robohiker's concerns  
> were an
> annoyance. I was not trying to annoy her, I have been worried about  
> these
> things and wanted to put them out there. So after the response I  
> received,
> I'll just wish them the best and not worry. I am amazed at the way  
> people on
> this site get so upset with people who don't agree with them 100%,  
> or try to
> help with bringing up a different perspective. It really feels like  
> many
> aren't that open minded as they want people to think they are.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Well, have you ever heard the term "Unsolicited Advice"?
>
> Gail has covered this topic to death, and I can assure you she knows  
> all the problems associated
> with bringing her dog.  She didn't ask for anyones advice, and to  
> impose yours upon her is rude.
> Concern is one thing, but it amounts to criticism when you do it the  
> way you did.  If you were so
> concerned about the welfare of her dog, why not just privately e- 
> mail her and open a dialog on the
> subject rather than malign her in public.
>
> Really now, this subject has been beaten to death here.  Let it be.
>
> Doc Holiday
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> To unsubscribe or change list options (digest, etc):
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l