[pct-l] sharing camera video on the web

[Len Glassner]

It looks decent on my computer. Both from the Casio/MPEG4 and the new
Canon/MPEG3.  I actually like the Canon output more, when displayed on
computer.

My point was, the youtube-uploaded Casio/MPEG4 looks oodles better
than the youtube-uploaded Canon/MPEG3.  I wouldn't bother with anymore
youtube uploads for MPEG3.

You can see what I'm talking about if you go to youtube and search for
all the videos from len5742. The ones uploaded in the last day or two
started life as MPEG3, the rest MPEG4.

Halfmile pointed out www.vimeo.com.

Compare one of my youtube uploads to the same thing on vimeo -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bb_beRxp5X8

http://www.vimeo.com/900430

I think vimeo looks much better.  And you can run the video
fullscreen, though it doesn't look so good.  The upload/convert
process takes longer on vimeo.  And it has a weekly upload limit. And,
reading about vimeo, I wonder if it is long for this world. But I
don't even want to look at what's on youtube.

On 4/14/08, Carl Siechert <carlito at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the output of either camera look decent on your computer (i.e., before
> you upload to YouTube)? If it's junk to begin with, it's certainly not going
> to improve with all the conversions.