[pct-l] Journal sites

[Greg Kesselring]

I haven't gone over postholer's site in depth, but I didn't notice the 
negative agenda about another PCT activity that you referred to, so I'm 
wondering what that negative agenda is and what PCT activity it refers to.

(I think postholer's site is pretty cool, but I haven't looked at every 
nook and cranny.)

Greg

jomike at cot.net wrote:
> Thought I'd chime in as a reader of the two sites. But first, I admit change is not always easy for me.
>
> I just went to both sites, and for this "older" woman Scott's site is too good - he has far too much information for me. I get distracted and all but lost with all the highlights of many different sites, etc. And yet, I can well see where that would be a positive for the younger folks (I'm sticking with Georgi). Finally for whatever it's worth I would never want to patronize a site that has such a bold, negative agenda about another pct activity. According to my Momma, that's just plain bad manners (and rather unprofessional).
>
> As for Trail Journals, it rings familiar to me, which is always a plus. And, it does not hit me with over loaded pages of information.
>
> So, for whatever it's worth, probably not much, there you have it from one who reads the journals of many folks.
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
>