[pct-l] tarptent vs. six moons designs

[Brett]

>>Silnylon is a wonderful thing! But if it's abraded, it looses its
waterproofness. <<

FWIW, the heavier 70D sil is coated rather than impregnated, and the coated side faces inward on the SMD tent floors.  



Mike Saenz wrote:
> I dot the underside of my pad to reduce the silnylon slipping thing.
> Less dots, and I'd rather not add anything that would make things tug on
> the silnylon.
>
> Silnylon is a wonderful thing! But if it's abraded, it looses its
> waterproofness. Follow Ron's advice to use a ground sheet under his
> Lunar Solos (he ships them with precut Tyvek sheets).
>
> Treat it well and the Lunar Solo will keep you dry.
> If you want "bomber", get a MtnHardwear, or similar 3 and 4 season tent.
>
> Michael  Saenz
> Associate Partner
>
> MVE Studio, Inc. | Architecture 
> Irvine + Oakland + Honolulu
>
> 1900 Main Street, Suite 800 | Irvine, California 92614-7318 | T
> 949.809.2700 | www.mve-studio.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net
> [mailto:pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net] On Behalf Of Brett
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:52 AM
> To: pct-l at backcountry.net
> Cc: David Stewart
> Subject: Re: [pct-l] tarptent vs. six moons designs
>
> One thing to consider is whether you're okay with a 1.3oz sq/yd 
> sil-nylon floor, which is very slippery unless you apply dots of seam 
> sealer or employ some other grip-adding trick. TT appears to offer only 
> 1.3oz sil floors, while SMD offers a choice of 1.3oz and ~1.9oz sil, the
>
> latter of which is sufficiently un-slick to use without modification. 
> Beyond that, the heavier sil-nylon is plenty durable enough to use 
> without a ground sheet, even in the desert. Once you add the weight of a
>
> (basically, mandatory) ground sheet beneath the floor of a 1.3 TT, the 
> weight is essentially the same as an SMD "heavy floor" without a sheet.
>
> In my experience, the Lunar Solo blocks more wind than the Contrail, as 
> the Contrail's side and rear panels stop shorter of the ground, at least
>
> when pitching in the usual "high rear-strut" position.
>
> On the flip side, the Contrail can be pitched tauter for less effort, 
> but be prepared to step outside to adjust pitch during a rainy night. 
> More than 4 stakes are generally helpful to minimize sagging, which is 
> sil-nylon's wet-weather achille's heal.
>
> IMHO, HYOH,
> - blisterfree
>
> Mike Saenz wrote:
>   
>> I've had one of Ron's Lunar Solos for three years now.
>>
>> I love it.
>>
>> But describing ANY UL tent as "bomber" is inaccurate. As with any 
>> piece of gear that trades off durability for weight, you need to be 
>> more careful where and how you pitch the Lunar.
>>
>> That said- In the three years I've had my Lunar, 90% of the time, I'll
>>     
>
>   
>> opt to us it instead of my TNF 3-season. And I have not yet had to 
>> repair it once!
>>
>> I've never had, nor used a Tarptent product, so I can't give an 
>> opinion one way or the other. But when the time comes to replace my 
>> Lunar, I'll replace it with whatever Ron has cooked up that matches
>>     
> it.
>   
>> -cheers
>>
>> Oilcan
>>
>>
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>> *Michael Saenz*
>> Associate Partner
>>
>>
>> MVE Studio, Inc. | Architecture
>> Irvine + Oakland + Honolulu
>>
>> 1900 Main Street, Suite 800 | Irvine, California 92614-7318 | T 
>> 949.809.2700 | www.mve-studio.com <http://www.mve-studio.com/>
>>
>> <http://www.mve-studio.com/>
>>
>>
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>> *From:* pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net 
>> [mailto:pct-l-bounces at backcountry.net] *On Behalf Of *David Stewart
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:09 PM
>> *To:* pct-l at backcountry.net
>> *Subject:* [pct-l] tarptent vs. six moons designs
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am looking at the Tarptent Contrail and the Six moons designs Lunar 
>> solo. contrail is 40 dollars cheaper and only uses 4 
>> stakes...otherwise, these suckers are virtually identical (weight, 
>> size, everything).
>>
>> it comes down to build quality.
>>
>> what is the general concensus on these 2 companies? whose construction
>>     
>
>   
>> is more "bomber"? is all gear from six moons US made?
>>
>> i really appreciate the feedback.
>>
>> thanks again...
>>
>> -moondog
>>
>> mailgate1.mve-architects.com made the following annotations
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and 
>> is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
>> If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this 
>> message in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
>> distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you 
>> have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by 
>> return e-mail or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed 
>> above, then promptly and permanently delete this message. Thank you 
>> for your cooperation and consideration. 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> To unsubscribe or change list options (digest, etc):
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l
>
> mailgate1.mve-architects.com made the following annotations---------------------------------------------------------------------The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly and permanently delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>